Cast by decent-artlu
it's time for some Nietzsche > polite discourse better than moral outrage 1. Moral Outrage as *Ressentiment* In *Zarathustra*, Nietzsche introduces the concept of"tarantulas"—a metaphor for preachers of equality and moral outrage. He argues that moral outrage is rarely about justice; instead, it is driven by *ressentiment*: a toxic mix of envy, malice, and weakness disguised as moral superiority 2. Moving "Beyond Good and Evil" Polite discourse implies willingness to step outside of absolute tribal dogmas to look at ideas objectively. Moral outrage relies on a rigid binary: "I am completely good, and you are completely evil" 3. The Need for Self-Mastery Polite discourse requires immense self-control, emotional regulation, and self-mastery. Outrage, by contrast, is a reactive, unthinking emotional spasm
1 reply
**Beware of the "Last Man"** If "polite discourse" means sterile, superficial politeness aimed at making everyone comfortable and avoiding difficult truths, Nietzsche would despise it. He called people who seek total comfort and avoid all conflict "The Last Man"—the ultimate symbol of societal stagnation
^^^ai wrote those words, I edited by hand^^^ with versioned history on blyg (a mix of x, substack, github, and wordpress)
