Cast by whimsi.eth
Show the cast this replies toyes but your casts will also show up on the farcaster protocol (whilst you’ve still voted yes and unless you get shadow banned) which means you can cast but under the jurisdiction of the nsfc
2 replies
snapchain, for now, receives shared message types (casts, likes, etc). i doubt they'll keep it compatible, they already made an "emergency" security update that changed block headers (unrelated to the actual security concerns in the update). we are no longer following snapchain on our side, so any further breakage they do is their decision to make. but that said, people like me who were purged dissenters cannot be seen on nsfc regardless of snapchain replicating the data.
I had thought Hypersnap was being forked so it would be independent. I was reacting to the comment above about Farcaster changing to network state without free speech as a stated goal, and if that’s the case, people should be able to support both as different projects with different goals?
I followed until the under "jurisdiction of NSFC." Venue is Quilcast, for example. I'm here now. My casts should still show on FC main, because I voted yes and was not banned, yet. Either way, banned people here on Quilcast see all FC casts, and may reply, but you won't see their replies in FC main. That's as far as knowledge takes me. Don't ask me how anything works.
hopefully this analogy makes sense! you’re allowed to look at us in the playground, even play with us in the playground, but you don’t get to play in the playground under the same rules as us as you have a parent who can tell you off if you don’t follow their rules
If you’re replying to someone who hasn’t excepted the terms of service then the reply may not show on the FC client
